Publicación:
Caracterización de las prácticas de innovación abierta en las pymes manufactureras en Bogotá

dc.contributor.authorGómez-Cristancho, Maria Alejandra
dc.contributor.authorRomero-Albarracin, Laura Sofia
dc.contributor.authorPalacios-Osma, Jose Ignacio
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-26T09:08:08Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-18T14:43:19Z
dc.date.available2021-04-26T09:08:08Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-26
dc.description.abstractEn la actualidad, el principal objetivo de las organizaciones empresariales es aumentar la competitividad, por esta razón la innovación abierta se presenta como proceso facilitador en el desarrollo y el crecimiento de las empresas. Teniendo esto en cuenta, el objetivo del artículo es reconocer la disposición que existe por parte de las empresas a interactuar con otros actores del entorno, como, por ejemplo, la universidad, y así generar procesos colaborativos. Para esto se realizó un análisis de variables cualitativas a través de cuestionarios realizados a algunas empresas pymes —pequeñas y medianas empresas— del sector manufacturero de Bogotá y a docentes e investigadores de la Universidad Distrital. A partir de los resultados del estudio se formula un modelo de integración que caracteriza los factores claves para el desarrollo de procesos de innovación abierta entre los actores analizados. El modelo de integración propuesto busca resaltar los factores relevantes para los actores en estudio, con el fin de que, basados en este, sea posible definir claramente las metodologías, los acuerdos y las plataformas a utilizar entre las partes, garantizando la relevancia de los factores identificados y asegurando que no hay límite entre ellos en los procesos de innovación abierta. El análisis permite concluir que la implementación de este paradigma implica el establecimiento de relaciones de confianza, disposición de las partes, estructuración de un modelo de gestión de innovación y definición de los derechos de autor junto con acuerdos de cooperación claros y específicos.spa
dc.description.abstractNowadays, the main objective of business organizations is to increase competitiveness, which is why open innovation appears as a facilitating process in business development and growth. With this in mind, the aim of this article is to recognize the willingness of companies to interact with other actors in the environment, for example universities, in order to generate collaborative processes. For this purpose, we carried out an analysis of qualitative variables by means of questionnaires to some SMEs -small and medium-sized enterprises- in the manufacturing sector in Bogotá, and to professors and researchers of Universidad Distrital. Based on the results, the study formulated an integration model that characterizes the key factors for the development of open innovation processes among the actors that were analyzed. The integration model proposed seeks to highlight the factors that may be relevant for the actors under study, so that, it is possible to clearly define the methodologies, agreements, and platforms to be used between the parties, guaranteeing the importance of the factors that were identified and assuring that there is no limit between them in the open innovation processes. The analysis allows to conclude that the implementation of this paradigm implies the establishment of trusting relationships, the willingness of the parties, the structuring of an innovation management model, and the definition of copyrights together with clear and specific cooperation agreements.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/xml
dc.identifier.doi10.21158/01208160.n90.2021.2931
dc.identifier.eissn2590-521X
dc.identifier.issn0120-8160
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10882/18591
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n90.2021.2931
dc.publisherUniversidad Ean
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/download/2931/2216
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/download/2931/2270
dc.relation.citationeditionGestión estratégica y cambio organizacional
dc.relation.citationissue90
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Ean
dc.relation.referencesAsociación Nacional de Instituciones Financieras. (2020). Gran encuesta pyme. Primer Semestre 2020. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3gQzCHs
dc.relation.referencesBarroso, J. M.; Cabero, J. (2013). La utilización del juicio de experto para la evaluación de TIC: el coeficiente de competencia experta. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 65(2), 25-38. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13042/brp.2013.65202
dc.relation.referencesBecker, B. A.; Eube, C. (2018). Open innovation concept: integrating universities and business in digital age. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(1), 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-018-0091-6
dc.relation.referencesBernal-Torres, C. A.; Frost-González, S. (2015). Innovación abierta en empresas colombianas: reto a superar. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 20(70), 252-267. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31876/revista.v20i70.19996
dc.relation.referencesCabrera-Flores, M.; López-Leyva, J.; Peris-Ortiz, M.; Orozco-Moreno, A.; Francisco-Sánchez, J.; Meza-Arballo, O. (2020). A framework of penta-helix model to improve the sustainable competitiveness of the wine industry in Baja California based on innovative natural resource management. E3S Web of Conferences, 167, 06005. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016706005
dc.relation.referencesCastellar, E. (2020). Una mirada al estado de la educación superior con relación a los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. Educación Superior y Sociedad, 32(2), 15-35. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3gVcp7f
dc.relation.referencesChesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/3kdv
dc.relation.referencesColciencias. (2021). Oficinas de Transferencia de Resultados de Investigación-OTRIS. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3zVclM7
dc.relation.referencesCrilly, M.; Vemury, C. M.; Humphrey, R.; Rodríguez, S.; Crosbie, T.; Johnson, K.; Wilson, A.; Heidrich, O. (2020). Common language of sustainability for built environment professionals. The quintuple helix model for higher education. Energies, 13(22), 5860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225860
dc.relation.referencesde las Heras-Rosas, C.; Herrera, J. (2021). Research trends in open innovation and the role of the university. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010029
dc.relation.referencesDepartamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. (2019). Encuesta de desarrollo e innovación tecnológica industria manufacturera-EDIT IX 2017'2018. Boletín Técnico. Recuperado de https://cutt.ly/LlFT68z
dc.relation.referencesEcopetrol. (2019). Innovación abierta. Recuperado de https://cutt.ly/rlFEo0Z
dc.relation.referencesEtzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: the triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002
dc.relation.referencesFlor, M. L.; Blasco-Díaz, J. L.; Lara-Ortiz, M. L. (2020). Innovation policy instruments through the lens of open innovation. An analysis in the Spanish context. Journal of Evolutionary Studies in Business, 5(1), 52-80. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1344/jesb2020.1.j068
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-González, A.; Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2019). Higher education for social entrepreneurship in the quadruple helix framework: co-construction in open innovation.
dc.relation.referencesEn M. A. Conde-González; F. J. Rodríguez-Sedano; C. Fernández-Llamas; F. J. García-Peñalvo (Eds.) Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. (925-929). Nueva York: Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.3362794
dc.relation.referencesGenuchten, E.; Calderón-González, A.; Mulder, I. (2019). Open innovation strategies for sustainable urban living. Sustainability, 11(12), 3310. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123310
dc.relation.referencesGloor, P. A. (2006). Swarm creativity: competitive advantage through collaborative innovation networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304121.001.0001
dc.relation.referencesGlukhova, L. V.; Sherstobitova, A. A.; Korneeva, E. N.; Krayneva, R. K. (2020). VUCA-managers training for smart systems: innovative and organizational approach. En V. Uskov; R. Howlett; L. C. Jain (Eds.) Smart education and e-learning 2020. (361-370). Singapur: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5584-8_31
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, J. J. M.; Rodríguez, M. T. D.; González, O. U. (2019). Factores que inciden en la gestión de conocimiento y la innovación abierta en empresas colombianas. Revista Virtual Universidad Católica del Norte, (58), 116-138. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35575/rvucn.n58a10
dc.relation.referencesHasche, N.; Linton, G.; Oberg, C. (2017). Trust in open innovation-the case of a med-tech start-up. European Journal of Innovation Management, 20(1), 31-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-10-2015-0111
dc.relation.referencesHuizingh, E. K. (2011). Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2-9. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002
dc.relation.referencesINNpulsa. (2021). Nosotros. Recuperado de https://www.innpulsacolombia.com/nosotros
dc.relation.referencesJamett, I.; Alvarado, L.; Maturana, S. (2017). Análisis al estado del arte de la innovación abierta: implicaciones prácticas en la ingeniería. Revista Ingeniería de Construcción, 32(2), 73-84. DOI: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50732017000200006
dc.relation.referencesJuca-Aulestia, M.; Labanda-Jaramillo, M.; Guaman-Quinche, J.; Coronel-Romero, E.; Chamba-Eras, L.; Jácome-Galarza, L.-R. (2020). Open innovation at university: a systematic literature review. En A. Rocha; H. Adeli; L. P. Reis; S. Costanzo; I. Orovic; F. Moreira (Eds.) Trends and Innovations in Information Systems and Technologies (Vol. 1, 3-14). DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45688-7_1
dc.relation.referencesLam, L.; Nguyen, P.; Le, N.; Tran, K. (2021). The relation among organizational culture, knowledge management, and innovation capability: its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010066
dc.relation.referencesLiu, Q.; Du, Q.; Hong, Y.; Fan, W.; Wu, S. (2020). User idea implementation in open innovation communities: evidence from a new product development crowdsourcing community. Information Systems Journal, 30(5), 899-927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12286
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Garzón, M. A.; Vaca-Sánchez, T. I. (2010). Innovación empresarial en pymes colombianas (Tesis de especialización). Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración. Bogotá, Colombia. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3jbxETC
dc.relation.referencesMuhammad, F.; Ikram, A.; Jafri, S. K.; Naveed, K. (2021). Product innovations through ambidextrous organizational culture with mediating effect of contextual ambidexterity: an empirical study of IT and telecom firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010009
dc.relation.referencesOvuakporie, O. D.; Pillai, K. G.; Wang, C.; Wei, Y. (2021). Differential moderating effects of strategic and operational reconfiguration on the relationship between open innovation practices and innovation performance. Research Policy, 50(1), 104146. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104146
dc.relation.referencesPalacios, J.; Ramírez-Montoya, M. S.; Cubo-Villalba, J.; Burgos, D. (2018). Maturity model for collaborative innovation: higher education challenge. Ponencia presentada en el 13th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). Caceres, España, 13-16 de junio.
dc.relation.referencesPayán-Sánchez, B.; Belmonte-Ureña, L.; Plaza-Úbeda, J.; Vazquez-Brust, D.; Yakovleva, N.; Pérez-Valls, M. (2021). Open innovation for sustainability or not: literature reviews of global research trends. Sustainability, 13(3), 1136. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031136
dc.relation.referencesSabato, N. R.; Botana, J. (1993). La ciencia y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina. Arbor: Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura, (575), 21-44.
dc.relation.referencesShutyak, Y. (2016). Open innovation practice: a case study of university spin-offs. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 12(1), 75-90. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7341/20161214
dc.relation.referencesSudiana, K., Sule, E. T., Soemaryani, I., Yunizar, Y. (2020). The development and validation of the penta helix construct. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(1), 136-145. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.11231
dc.relation.referencesTemiz, S. (2021). Open innovation via crowdsourcing: a digital only hackathon case study from Sweden. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010039
dc.relation.referencesValdez-Juárez, L. E.; Castillo-Vergara, M. (2020). Technological capabilities, open innovation, and eco-innovation: dynamic capabilities to increase corporate performance of SMEs. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 8. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010008
dc.relation.referencesVicente-Saez, R.; Gustafsson, R.; Van den Brande, L. (2020). The dawn of an open exploration era: emergent principles and practices of open science and innovation of university research teams in a digital world. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 156, 120037. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120037
dc.relation.referencesVlajcic, D.; Marzi, G.; Caputo, A.; Dabic, M. (2019). The role of geographical distance on the relationship between cultural intelligence and knowledge transfer. Business Process Management Journal, 25(1), 104-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-05-2017-0129
dc.relation.referencesWu, A.; Garimella, A.; Subramanyam, R. (2021). Could government measures crowd out grassroots philanthropy? Empirical evidence from an education crowdfunding platform. En The Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (Ed.) Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. (4138-4147) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2021.503
dc.relation.referencesYuan, C. H.; Li, Y.; Vlas, C. O.; Peng, M. W. (2018). Dynamic capabilities, subnational environment, and university technology transfer. Strategic Organization, 16(1), 35-60. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016667969
dc.relation.referencesYun, J. J.; Liu, Z. (2019). Micro-and macro-dynamics of open innovation with a quadruple-helix model. Sustainability, 11(12), 3301. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123301
dc.relation.referencesYun, J.; Zhao, X.; Jung, K.; Yigitcanlar, T. (2020). The culture for open innovation dynamics. Sustainability, 12(12), 5076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125076
dc.relation.referencesZakharov, P. N.; Posazhennikov, A. A.; Zakharova, Z. A. (2020). Open innovations as a tool of interaction between universities and business structures in the digital economy. En E. G. Popkova; B. Sergi (Eds.) Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. (Vol. 87, 301-306). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29586-8_35
dc.relation.referencesZobel, A. K.; Lokshin, B.; Hagedoorn, J. (2017). Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: the role of openness and innovativeness. Technovation, 59, 44-54. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.10.001
dc.rightsRevista Escuela de Administración de Negocios - 2021
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.sourcehttps://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/view/2931
dc.subjectSmall and medium businesseng
dc.subjectInnovations in the companyeng
dc.subjectManufacturing industrieseng
dc.subjectAcademic-industrial collaborationeng
dc.subjectPequeña y mediana empresaspa
dc.subjectInnovaciones en la empresaspa
dc.subjectIndustrias manufacturerasspa
dc.subjectCooperación universidad - Industriaspa
dc.titleCaracterización de las prácticas de innovación abierta en las pymes manufactureras en Bogotáspa
dc.title.translatedCharacterization of open innovation practices in manufacturing SMEs in Bogotáeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos

Colecciones