Publicación: Caracterización de las prácticas de innovación abierta en las pymes manufactureras en Bogotá
| dc.contributor.author | Gómez-Cristancho, Maria Alejandra | |
| dc.contributor.author | Romero-Albarracin, Laura Sofia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Palacios-Osma, Jose Ignacio | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-26T09:08:08Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-18T14:43:19Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-04-26T09:08:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-04-26 | |
| dc.description.abstract | En la actualidad, el principal objetivo de las organizaciones empresariales es aumentar la competitividad, por esta razón la innovación abierta se presenta como proceso facilitador en el desarrollo y el crecimiento de las empresas. Teniendo esto en cuenta, el objetivo del artículo es reconocer la disposición que existe por parte de las empresas a interactuar con otros actores del entorno, como, por ejemplo, la universidad, y así generar procesos colaborativos. Para esto se realizó un análisis de variables cualitativas a través de cuestionarios realizados a algunas empresas pymes —pequeñas y medianas empresas— del sector manufacturero de Bogotá y a docentes e investigadores de la Universidad Distrital. A partir de los resultados del estudio se formula un modelo de integración que caracteriza los factores claves para el desarrollo de procesos de innovación abierta entre los actores analizados. El modelo de integración propuesto busca resaltar los factores relevantes para los actores en estudio, con el fin de que, basados en este, sea posible definir claramente las metodologías, los acuerdos y las plataformas a utilizar entre las partes, garantizando la relevancia de los factores identificados y asegurando que no hay límite entre ellos en los procesos de innovación abierta. El análisis permite concluir que la implementación de este paradigma implica el establecimiento de relaciones de confianza, disposición de las partes, estructuración de un modelo de gestión de innovación y definición de los derechos de autor junto con acuerdos de cooperación claros y específicos. | spa |
| dc.description.abstract | Nowadays, the main objective of business organizations is to increase competitiveness, which is why open innovation appears as a facilitating process in business development and growth. With this in mind, the aim of this article is to recognize the willingness of companies to interact with other actors in the environment, for example universities, in order to generate collaborative processes. For this purpose, we carried out an analysis of qualitative variables by means of questionnaires to some SMEs -small and medium-sized enterprises- in the manufacturing sector in Bogotá, and to professors and researchers of Universidad Distrital. Based on the results, the study formulated an integration model that characterizes the key factors for the development of open innovation processes among the actors that were analyzed. The integration model proposed seeks to highlight the factors that may be relevant for the actors under study, so that, it is possible to clearly define the methodologies, agreements, and platforms to be used between the parties, guaranteeing the importance of the factors that were identified and assuring that there is no limit between them in the open innovation processes. The analysis allows to conclude that the implementation of this paradigm implies the establishment of trusting relationships, the willingness of the parties, the structuring of an innovation management model, and the definition of copyrights together with clear and specific cooperation agreements. | eng |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/xml | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.21158/01208160.n90.2021.2931 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2590-521X | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0120-8160 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10882/18591 | |
| dc.identifier.url | https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n90.2021.2931 | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad Ean | |
| dc.relation.bitstream | https://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/download/2931/2216 | |
| dc.relation.bitstream | https://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/download/2931/2270 | |
| dc.relation.citationedition | Gestión estratégica y cambio organizacional | |
| dc.relation.citationissue | 90 | |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal | Revista Ean | |
| dc.relation.references | Asociación Nacional de Instituciones Financieras. (2020). Gran encuesta pyme. Primer Semestre 2020. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3gQzCHs | |
| dc.relation.references | Barroso, J. M.; Cabero, J. (2013). La utilización del juicio de experto para la evaluación de TIC: el coeficiente de competencia experta. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 65(2), 25-38. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13042/brp.2013.65202 | |
| dc.relation.references | Becker, B. A.; Eube, C. (2018). Open innovation concept: integrating universities and business in digital age. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(1), 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-018-0091-6 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bernal-Torres, C. A.; Frost-González, S. (2015). Innovación abierta en empresas colombianas: reto a superar. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 20(70), 252-267. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31876/revista.v20i70.19996 | |
| dc.relation.references | Cabrera-Flores, M.; López-Leyva, J.; Peris-Ortiz, M.; Orozco-Moreno, A.; Francisco-Sánchez, J.; Meza-Arballo, O. (2020). A framework of penta-helix model to improve the sustainable competitiveness of the wine industry in Baja California based on innovative natural resource management. E3S Web of Conferences, 167, 06005. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016706005 | |
| dc.relation.references | Castellar, E. (2020). Una mirada al estado de la educación superior con relación a los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. Educación Superior y Sociedad, 32(2), 15-35. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3gVcp7f | |
| dc.relation.references | Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/3kdv | |
| dc.relation.references | Colciencias. (2021). Oficinas de Transferencia de Resultados de Investigación-OTRIS. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3zVclM7 | |
| dc.relation.references | Crilly, M.; Vemury, C. M.; Humphrey, R.; Rodríguez, S.; Crosbie, T.; Johnson, K.; Wilson, A.; Heidrich, O. (2020). Common language of sustainability for built environment professionals. The quintuple helix model for higher education. Energies, 13(22), 5860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225860 | |
| dc.relation.references | de las Heras-Rosas, C.; Herrera, J. (2021). Research trends in open innovation and the role of the university. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010029 | |
| dc.relation.references | Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. (2019). Encuesta de desarrollo e innovación tecnológica industria manufacturera-EDIT IX 2017'2018. Boletín Técnico. Recuperado de https://cutt.ly/LlFT68z | |
| dc.relation.references | Ecopetrol. (2019). Innovación abierta. Recuperado de https://cutt.ly/rlFEo0Z | |
| dc.relation.references | Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: the triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002 | |
| dc.relation.references | Flor, M. L.; Blasco-Díaz, J. L.; Lara-Ortiz, M. L. (2020). Innovation policy instruments through the lens of open innovation. An analysis in the Spanish context. Journal of Evolutionary Studies in Business, 5(1), 52-80. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1344/jesb2020.1.j068 | |
| dc.relation.references | García-González, A.; Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2019). Higher education for social entrepreneurship in the quadruple helix framework: co-construction in open innovation. | |
| dc.relation.references | En M. A. Conde-González; F. J. Rodríguez-Sedano; C. Fernández-Llamas; F. J. García-Peñalvo (Eds.) Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. (925-929). Nueva York: Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.3362794 | |
| dc.relation.references | Genuchten, E.; Calderón-González, A.; Mulder, I. (2019). Open innovation strategies for sustainable urban living. Sustainability, 11(12), 3310. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123310 | |
| dc.relation.references | Gloor, P. A. (2006). Swarm creativity: competitive advantage through collaborative innovation networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304121.001.0001 | |
| dc.relation.references | Glukhova, L. V.; Sherstobitova, A. A.; Korneeva, E. N.; Krayneva, R. K. (2020). VUCA-managers training for smart systems: innovative and organizational approach. En V. Uskov; R. Howlett; L. C. Jain (Eds.) Smart education and e-learning 2020. (361-370). Singapur: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5584-8_31 | |
| dc.relation.references | González, J. J. M.; Rodríguez, M. T. D.; González, O. U. (2019). Factores que inciden en la gestión de conocimiento y la innovación abierta en empresas colombianas. Revista Virtual Universidad Católica del Norte, (58), 116-138. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35575/rvucn.n58a10 | |
| dc.relation.references | Hasche, N.; Linton, G.; Oberg, C. (2017). Trust in open innovation-the case of a med-tech start-up. European Journal of Innovation Management, 20(1), 31-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-10-2015-0111 | |
| dc.relation.references | Huizingh, E. K. (2011). Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2-9. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002 | |
| dc.relation.references | INNpulsa. (2021). Nosotros. Recuperado de https://www.innpulsacolombia.com/nosotros | |
| dc.relation.references | Jamett, I.; Alvarado, L.; Maturana, S. (2017). Análisis al estado del arte de la innovación abierta: implicaciones prácticas en la ingeniería. Revista Ingeniería de Construcción, 32(2), 73-84. DOI: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50732017000200006 | |
| dc.relation.references | Juca-Aulestia, M.; Labanda-Jaramillo, M.; Guaman-Quinche, J.; Coronel-Romero, E.; Chamba-Eras, L.; Jácome-Galarza, L.-R. (2020). Open innovation at university: a systematic literature review. En A. Rocha; H. Adeli; L. P. Reis; S. Costanzo; I. Orovic; F. Moreira (Eds.) Trends and Innovations in Information Systems and Technologies (Vol. 1, 3-14). DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45688-7_1 | |
| dc.relation.references | Lam, L.; Nguyen, P.; Le, N.; Tran, K. (2021). The relation among organizational culture, knowledge management, and innovation capability: its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010066 | |
| dc.relation.references | Liu, Q.; Du, Q.; Hong, Y.; Fan, W.; Wu, S. (2020). User idea implementation in open innovation communities: evidence from a new product development crowdsourcing community. Information Systems Journal, 30(5), 899-927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12286 | |
| dc.relation.references | López-Garzón, M. A.; Vaca-Sánchez, T. I. (2010). Innovación empresarial en pymes colombianas (Tesis de especialización). Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración. Bogotá, Colombia. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3jbxETC | |
| dc.relation.references | Muhammad, F.; Ikram, A.; Jafri, S. K.; Naveed, K. (2021). Product innovations through ambidextrous organizational culture with mediating effect of contextual ambidexterity: an empirical study of IT and telecom firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010009 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ovuakporie, O. D.; Pillai, K. G.; Wang, C.; Wei, Y. (2021). Differential moderating effects of strategic and operational reconfiguration on the relationship between open innovation practices and innovation performance. Research Policy, 50(1), 104146. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104146 | |
| dc.relation.references | Palacios, J.; Ramírez-Montoya, M. S.; Cubo-Villalba, J.; Burgos, D. (2018). Maturity model for collaborative innovation: higher education challenge. Ponencia presentada en el 13th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). Caceres, España, 13-16 de junio. | |
| dc.relation.references | Payán-Sánchez, B.; Belmonte-Ureña, L.; Plaza-Úbeda, J.; Vazquez-Brust, D.; Yakovleva, N.; Pérez-Valls, M. (2021). Open innovation for sustainability or not: literature reviews of global research trends. Sustainability, 13(3), 1136. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031136 | |
| dc.relation.references | Sabato, N. R.; Botana, J. (1993). La ciencia y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina. Arbor: Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura, (575), 21-44. | |
| dc.relation.references | Shutyak, Y. (2016). Open innovation practice: a case study of university spin-offs. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 12(1), 75-90. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7341/20161214 | |
| dc.relation.references | Sudiana, K., Sule, E. T., Soemaryani, I., Yunizar, Y. (2020). The development and validation of the penta helix construct. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(1), 136-145. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.11231 | |
| dc.relation.references | Temiz, S. (2021). Open innovation via crowdsourcing: a digital only hackathon case study from Sweden. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010039 | |
| dc.relation.references | Valdez-Juárez, L. E.; Castillo-Vergara, M. (2020). Technological capabilities, open innovation, and eco-innovation: dynamic capabilities to increase corporate performance of SMEs. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 8. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010008 | |
| dc.relation.references | Vicente-Saez, R.; Gustafsson, R.; Van den Brande, L. (2020). The dawn of an open exploration era: emergent principles and practices of open science and innovation of university research teams in a digital world. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 156, 120037. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120037 | |
| dc.relation.references | Vlajcic, D.; Marzi, G.; Caputo, A.; Dabic, M. (2019). The role of geographical distance on the relationship between cultural intelligence and knowledge transfer. Business Process Management Journal, 25(1), 104-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-05-2017-0129 | |
| dc.relation.references | Wu, A.; Garimella, A.; Subramanyam, R. (2021). Could government measures crowd out grassroots philanthropy? Empirical evidence from an education crowdfunding platform. En The Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (Ed.) Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. (4138-4147) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2021.503 | |
| dc.relation.references | Yuan, C. H.; Li, Y.; Vlas, C. O.; Peng, M. W. (2018). Dynamic capabilities, subnational environment, and university technology transfer. Strategic Organization, 16(1), 35-60. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016667969 | |
| dc.relation.references | Yun, J. J.; Liu, Z. (2019). Micro-and macro-dynamics of open innovation with a quadruple-helix model. Sustainability, 11(12), 3301. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123301 | |
| dc.relation.references | Yun, J.; Zhao, X.; Jung, K.; Yigitcanlar, T. (2020). The culture for open innovation dynamics. Sustainability, 12(12), 5076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125076 | |
| dc.relation.references | Zakharov, P. N.; Posazhennikov, A. A.; Zakharova, Z. A. (2020). Open innovations as a tool of interaction between universities and business structures in the digital economy. En E. G. Popkova; B. Sergi (Eds.) Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. (Vol. 87, 301-306). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29586-8_35 | |
| dc.relation.references | Zobel, A. K.; Lokshin, B.; Hagedoorn, J. (2017). Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: the role of openness and innovativeness. Technovation, 59, 44-54. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.10.001 | |
| dc.rights | Revista Escuela de Administración de Negocios - 2021 | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights.coar | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | |
| dc.source | https://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/view/2931 | |
| dc.subject | Small and medium business | eng |
| dc.subject | Innovations in the company | eng |
| dc.subject | Manufacturing industries | eng |
| dc.subject | Academic-industrial collaboration | eng |
| dc.subject | Pequeña y mediana empresa | spa |
| dc.subject | Innovaciones en la empresa | spa |
| dc.subject | Industrias manufactureras | spa |
| dc.subject | Cooperación universidad - Industria | spa |
| dc.title | Caracterización de las prácticas de innovación abierta en las pymes manufactureras en Bogotá | spa |
| dc.title.translated | Characterization of open innovation practices in manufacturing SMEs in Bogotá | eng |
| dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |
| dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |
| dc.type.content | Text | |
| dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF | |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
