Publicación:
Factores impulsores de la propensión a innovar y la productividad en los sectores de servicios y la industria manufacturera en Colombia

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Luna, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorCardoso-López, Diego Andrés
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-29T12:51:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-18T14:42:57Z
dc.date.available2020-09-29T12:51:23Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-29
dc.description.abstractEl objetivo de este artículo es analizar los factores que impulsan la propensión a innovar y el desarrollo de la productividad en los sectores de servicios e industria manufacturera en Colombia —2013 a 2017—. Para su cumplimiento se utilizó una función de innovación con el fin de representar las características que inciden en la capacidad innovadora, en conjunto con vectores de características de las empresas y de insumos que permiten calcular el efecto de estos factores en la producción. Además, por medio de una función Cobb–Douglas se calculó la productividad total de los factores (PTF) y se examinó la variación de las productividades para ambos sectores. Entre los principales resultados se evidenció que el tamaño de las empresas, la inversión extranjera directa (IED) y la cooperación con otras instituciones tienen un impacto significativo en la propensión a innovar; así mismo, el porcentaje de capital humano y de exportaciones tienen un efecto positivo generalizado, el cual es mayor en el sector de servicios. En el cálculo de la productividad, el stock de capital físico, los trabajadores y las inversiones en investigación y desarrollo (I+D) tienen una participación positiva en el crecimiento empresarial de ambos sectores. Las variaciones de la productividad evidencian mayores incrementos y niveles más homogéneos del sector manufacturero en comparación con los servicios en los periodos estudiados.spa
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this article is to analyze the factors that drive the propensity to innovation and productivity in the service and manufacturing sectors in Colombia from 2013 to 2017. In order to accomplish this goal, we used an innovation function to represent the characteristics that affect the innovative capacity of the company, together with vectors for the characteristics of the company and for inputs, that allow calculating the effect of these factors on the production. In addition, we calculated the total factor productivity (TFP) with a Cobb-Douglas function, and examined the variation in the productivity for both sectors. The main results make clear that the size of the companies, the foreign direct investment (FDI), and the cooperation with other institutions have a significant impact on the propensity to innovate; likewise, the percentage of human capital and exports has a widespread positive effect, which is greater in the service sector. In the calculation of productivity, the stock of physical capital, workers, and investment in research and development (R&D) have a positive participation in the business growth of both sectors. Variations in productivity during the periods that were studied show greater increases and more homogeneous levels in the manufacturing sector than in the services sector.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/xml
dc.identifier.doi10.21158/01208160.n0.2020.2730
dc.identifier.eissn2590-521X
dc.identifier.issn0120-8160
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10882/18565
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n0.2020.2730
dc.publisherUniversidad Ean
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/download/2730/2112
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/download/2730/2300
dc.relation.citationeditionEdición especial Servicios creativos y de conocimiento: aportes al desarrollo económico
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Ean
dc.relation.referencesAboal, D.; Tacsir, E. (2018). Innovation and productivity in services and manufacturing : the role of ICT. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(2), 221-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtx030
dc.relation.referencesAgarwal, R.; Selen, W. (2011). Multi-dimensional nature of service innovation: operationalisation of the elevated service offerings construct in collaborative. International Journal of Operations & Production Management , 31(11), 1164-1192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111178484
dc.relation.referencesBeveren, I. van. (2012). Total factor productivity estimation: a practical review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(1), 98-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00631.x
dc.relation.referencesBroadberry, S. N. (1995). Comparative industrial productivity levels in manufacturing since the Revolution : lessons from Britain, America, Germany and Japan. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6(1), 71- 95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0954-349X(94)00004-S
dc.relation.referencesBrondino, G. (2019). Productivity growth and structural change in China (1995-2009): a subsystems analysis. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 49(C),183-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.09.001
dc.relation.referencesCainelli, G.; Evangelista, R.; Savona, M. (2006). Innovation and economic performance in services : a firm-level analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(3), 435-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei067
dc.relation.referencesCamino-Mogro, S. (2017). Estimación de una función de producción y análisis de la productividad: el sector de innovación global en mercados locales. Estudios Gerenciales, 33(145), 400-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2017.10.004
dc.relation.referencesCarvalho, L.; Avellar, A. (2017). Innovation and productivity : empirical evidence for Brazilian industrial enterprises. Revista de Administração, 52(2), 134-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.12.009
dc.relation.referencesChapman, R.; Soosay, C.; Kandampully, J. (2002). Innovation in logistic services and the new business model : a conceptual framework. Managing Services Quality, 12(6), 358-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520210451849
dc.relation.referencesChen, S.; Jefferson, G. H.; Zhang, J. (2011). China Economic Review structural change, productivity growth and industrial transformation in China. China Economic Review, 22(1), 133-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2010.10.003
dc.relation.referencesChung, H. (2018). ICT investment-specific technological change and productivity growth in Korea : comparison of 1996-2005 and 2006-2015. Telecommunications Policy, 42(1), 78-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.08.005
dc.relation.referencesCrespi, G.; Tacsir, E.; Vargas, F. (2016). Innovation dynamics and productivity: evidence for Latin America. En M. Grazzi; P. Carlo (Eds.) Firm innovation and productivity in Latin America and the Caribbean: the engine of economic development. (37-72). Washington D. C.: Inter-American Development Bank.
dc.relation.referencesCrespi, G.; Zuniga, P. (2012). Innovation and productivity: evidence from six Latin American countries. World Development, 40(2), 273-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.010
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2017). Encuesta de desarrollo e innovación tecnológica (EDIT). Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2J2B63v
dc.relation.referencesDimelis, S. P.; Papaioannou, S. K. (2011). ICT growth effects at the industry level : a comparison between the US and the EU. Information Economics and Policy, 23(1), 37-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2010.03.004
dc.relation.referencesEslava, M.; Haltiwanger, J.; Kugler, A.; Kugler, M. (2013). Trade and market selection: evidence from manufacturing plants in Colombia. Review of Economic Dynamics, 16(1), 135-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2012.10.009
dc.relation.referencesFleury, A. (1995). Quality and productivity in the competitive strategies of Brazilian industrial enterprises. World Development, 23(1), 73–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)00113-D
dc.relation.referencesGrönroos, C.; Ojasalo, K. (2015). Service productivity as mutual learning. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 7(2/3), 296–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-03-2015-0035
dc.relation.referencesHall, B. H.; Lotti, F.; Mairesse, J. (2009). Innovation and productivity in SMEs : empirical evidence for Italy. Small Business Economics, 33, 13-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9184-8
dc.relation.referencesHalpern, L.; Muraközy, B. (2012). Innovation, productivity and exports : the case of Hungary. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(2), 151-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2011.561995
dc.relation.referencesHaskel, J.; Wallis, G. (2013). Public support for innovation, intangible investment and productivity growth in the UK market sector. Economics Letters, 119(2), 195-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.02.011
dc.relation.referencesHeckman, J. (1976). The common structure of statitical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variable and simpler estimation and such models. En B. Stanford (Ed.) The Annals of Economic and Social Measurenment, Vol. 5, Núm 4. (475-492). Cambridge, MA: NBER
dc.relation.referencesHeggedal, T.; Moen, E. R.; Preugschat, E. (2017). Productivity spillovers through labor mobility in search. Journal of Economic Theory, 169, 551-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2017.03.003
dc.relation.referencesHussinger, K. (2008). R & D and subsidies at the firm level : an application of parametric and semiparametric two-step selection models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(6), 729-747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae1016
dc.relation.referencesJunarsin, E. (2010). Issues in the innovation service product process : a managerial perspective. International Journal of Management, 27(3).
dc.relation.referencesKleinknecht, A. (1996). New indicators and determinantes of innovation: an introduction. En A. Kleinknecht (Ed.) Determinants of innovation.(1-13). Londres: MacMillan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 1-349-13917-0
dc.relation.referencesKlomp, L.; Leeuwen, G. van. (2001). Linking innovation and firm performance : a new approach. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(3), 343-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13571510110079612
dc.relation.referencesKriaa, M.; Karray, Z. (2010). Innovation and R&D investment of Tunisian firms: a two-regime model with selectivity correction. The Journal of Business Inquiry, 9(1), 1-21.
dc.relation.referencesLee, R.; Lee, J.; Garrett, T. C. (2019). Synergy effects of innovation on firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 99, 507–515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.032
dc.relation.referencesLevinsohn, J.; Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. The Review of Economic Studies. 70(2), 317-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00246
dc.relation.referencesMachado, R.; Tello-Gamarra, J. (2017). Inovação em serviços: estado da arte e perspectivas futuras. Suma de Negocios, 8(17), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sumneg.2017.01.002
dc.relation.referencesMáñez, J.; Rochina-Barrachina, M.; Sanchis, A.; Sanchis, J. A. (2013). Do process innovations boost SMEs productivity growth ? Empirical Economics, 44(3), 1373-1405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0571-7
dc.relation.referencesMessa, A. (2014). Metodologias de cálculo da produtividade total dos fatores e da produtividade da mão de obra. En F. de Negri; L. Calvacante (Orgs.) Productividade no Brasil: desempenho e determinantes. (87-109). IPEA.
dc.relation.referencesMestieri, M.; Schauer, J.; Townsend, R. M. (2017). Human capital acquisition and occupational choice : implications for economic development. Review of Economic Dynamics, 25, 151-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2017.02.001
dc.relation.referencesMontes-Rojas, G.; Santamaría, M. (2007). Sources of productivity growth : evidence from the Mexican manufacturing sector. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 18(3), 263-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2007.06.004
dc.relation.referencesMorikawa, M. (2019). Innovation in the service sector and the role of patents and trade secrets : evidence from Japanese firms. Journal of The Japanese and International Economies, 51, 43-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2018.10.003
dc.relation.referencesNakamura, K.; Kaihatsu, S.; Yagi, T. (2019). Productivity improvement and economic growth : lessons. Economic Analysis and Policy, 62, 57-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2018.11.002
dc.relation.referencesOECD; Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual, guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4a ed.). París: OECD Publishing. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3nZOiVz
dc.relation.referencesOzyilmaz, A. (2001). Service innovation audit and role of information technology in service innovation. Nueva York: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
dc.relation.referencesPasban, M.; Nojedeh, S. H. (2016). A review of the role of human capital in the organization. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 249-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.032
dc.relation.referencesPetrin, A.; Poi, B.; Levinsohn, J. (2004). Production function estimation in Stata using inputs to control for unobservables. The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata 4(2), 113-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0400400202
dc.relation.referencesRamírez, J. M.; Zubieta, I.; Bedoya, J. G. (Agosto de 2014). Productividad y competitividad del sistema de ciudades. Fedesarrollo. Bogotá, Colombia.Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3fBLwmt
dc.relation.referencesRath, B. N. (2018). Productivity growth and efficiency change : comparing manufacturing and service-based firms in India. Economic Modelling, 70, 447-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.08.024
dc.relation.referencesRaymond, L.; St-Pierre, J. (2010). R & D as a determinant of innovation in manufacturing SMEs : an attempt at empirical clarification. Technovation, 30(1), 48-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.05.005
dc.relation.referencesSala-i-Martín, X. (2000). Apuntes de crecimiento económico (2ª ed.). España: Antoni Bosch.
dc.relation.referencesSánchez-Sellero, P.; Sánchez-Sellero, M. C.; Sánchez-Sellero, F. J.; Cruz-González, M. M. (2014). Innovación y productividad manufacturera. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 9(3), 135-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242014000300010
dc.relation.referencesSingh, G.; Gupta, A.; Juneja, C. (2018). Productivity measurement of manufacturing system. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(1), 1483-489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.237
dc.relation.referencesSubramanian, U.; Anderson, W. P.; Lee, K. (2005). Measuring the impact of the investment climate on total factor productivity: the cases of China and Brazil (N.o 3792). World Bank, Washington, DC., EE.UU. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3792
dc.relation.referencesSvyerson, C. (2011). What determines productivity? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2), 326-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.2.326
dc.relation.referencesTello, M. D. (2017). Innovación y productividad en las empresas de servicios y manufactureras: el caso del Perú. Cepal Review, (121), 73-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/78513868-es
dc.relation.referencesVan Biesebroeck, J.(2004). Robustness of productivity estimates. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 55(3), 529-569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2007.00322.x
dc.relation.referencesVang, J.; Zellner, C. (2005). Introduction : innovation in services. Industry and Innovation, 12(2), 147-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710500087875
dc.relation.referencesVarella, A.; Cabral, R. (2009). Productivity effects on Mexican manufacturing employment. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 20(1), 66-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2008.10.002
dc.relation.referencesVeugelers, R. (1997). Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy, 26(3), 303- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00019X
dc.relation.referencesVillarreal, N. F.; Lucio-Arias, D.; Albis, N.; Mora, H. (2014). Determinantes de la innovación y la productividad en la industria manufacturera colombiana por tamaño de firma. Bogotá, Colombia Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2V4eB0a
dc.relation.referencesWeerawardena, J.; Mccoll-kennedy, J. R. (2002). New service development and competitive advantage : a conceptual model. Australasian Marketing Journal, 10(1), 13-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1441- 3582(02)70140-7
dc.relation.referencesWeinstein, O.; Gallouj, F. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 537-556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00030-9
dc.relation.referencesZagler, M. (2002). Services, innovation and the new economy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 13(3), 337–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(02)00004-8
dc.rightsRevista Escuela de Administración de Negocios - 2020
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.sourcehttps://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/view/2730
dc.subjectResearch and developmenteng
dc.subjectInnovationeng
dc.subjectManufacturing industrieseng
dc.subjectIndustrial Productivityeng
dc.subjectInvestigación y desarrollospa
dc.subjectInnovaciónspa
dc.subjectIndustrias manufacturerasspa
dc.subjectProductividad industrialspa
dc.titleFactores impulsores de la propensión a innovar y la productividad en los sectores de servicios y la industria manufacturera en Colombiaspa
dc.title.translatedDrivers of the propensity to innovation and productivity in the service sectors and manufacturing industry in Colombiaeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos

Colecciones

Revista Ean