Publicación:
Incidencia de la productividad en la introducción de innovaciones para las empresas manufactureras del Cauca, Colombia

dc.contributor.authorRuiz Ruiz, Valentina
dc.contributor.authorTorres Ceballos, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Sánchez, Andrés Mauricio
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-15T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-18T14:44:26Z
dc.date.available2024-07-15T00:00:00Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-15
dc.description.abstractEste documento explora la hipótesis de autoselección por innovaciones en la industria manufacturera caucana. Esto es, la incidencia de la productividad total de los factores (PTF) en la introducción de innovaciones y no la causalidad contraria, es decir, la hipótesis de aprendizaje por innovaciones. Inicialmente, se estima la PTF a través de un proceso bietápico, incluyendo un proceso markoviano endógeno, para posteriormente implementar un modelo probit dinámico, con datos panel que introduce el patrón de la experiencia exportadora, al igual que trata el problema de las condiciones iniciales, con el fin de evitar problemas de endogeneidad. La información se obtiene del Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE), específicamente de la encuesta anual manufacturera (EAM); de la encuesta de innovación y desarrollo tecnológico (EDIT) y de la encuesta anual TIC (EAM-TIC), en el periodo 2023-2018; con lo cual se obtiene un panel que consta de 435 observaciones repartidas en 92 empresas. Para comparar los resultados se estima también el modelo para la región, conformada por Bogotá, Antioquia y Valle (BAV); al igual que para Colombia. Los principales resultados señalan una evidencia tenue y discrecional del proceso de autoselección por innovaciones en el departamento del Cauca, al igual que en la región BAV y en Colombia, ya que sus impactos son bajos y dependen del tipo de innovación analizado.spa
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores the self-selection hypothesis for innovations in the Cauca manufacturing industry. That is, the impact of total factor productivity (TFP) on the introduction of innovations, rather than the opposite causality, i.e., the learning-through-innovation hypothesis. Initially, TFP is estimated through a two-stage process, including an endogenous Markovian process, and then a dynamic probit model is implemented with panel data that introduces the pattern of export experience and addresses the problem of initial conditions, in order to avoid endogeneity problems. The information is obtained from the National Administrative Department of Statistics (DANE), specifically from the Annual Manufacturing Survey (EAM); the Innovation and Technological Development Survey (EDIT); and the Annual ICT Survey (EAM-TIC), for the period 2023–2018. This results in a panel consisting of 435 observations spread across 92 firms. To compare the results, the model is also estimated for the region comprised of Bogotá, Antioquia, and Valle (BAV), as well as for Colombia. The main results indicate weak and discretionary evidence of the self-selection process for innovations in the department of Cauca, as well as in the BAV region and Colombia, since its impacts are low and depend on the type of innovation analyzed.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.21158/01208160.n96.2024.3848
dc.identifier.eissn2590-521X
dc.identifier.issn0120-8160
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10882/18669
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n96.2024.3848
dc.publisherUniversidad Ean
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/download/3848/2461
dc.relation.citationissue96
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Ean
dc.relation.referencesAbeles, M., Cimoli, M. y Lavarello, P.J. (2017). Manufactura y cambio estructural. Aportes para pensar la política industrial en la Argentina. CEPAL. https://hdl.handle.net/11362/42393
dc.relation.referencesAckerberg, D. A., Caves, K. &Frazer, G. (2015). Identification properties of recent production function estimators. Econometrica, 83(6), 2411-2451. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA13408
dc.relation.referencesAghion, P., Bergeaud, A., Lequien, M. & Melitz, M. J. (2018). The impact of exports on innovation: Theory and evidence. Banque de France Working Paper No. 678. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3171084
dc.relation.referencesAlbis, N. & Álvarez, I. (2017). A comparative analysis of the innovation performance between foreign subsidiaries and owned domestic firms in Colombian manufacturing sector. Journal of Globalization, Competitiveness and Governability, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3232/GCG.2017.V11.N2.01
dc.relation.referencesArbeláez, M. A. & Parra, M. A. (2011). Innovation, research and development investment and productivity in Colombian firms. IDB Working Paper Series, IDBWP-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1858064
dc.relation.referencesAudretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Mit Press. Bilbao‐Osorio, B. & Rodríguez‐Pose, A. (2004). From R&D to innovation and economic growth in the EU. Growth and Change, 35(4), 434-455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2004.00256.x
dc.relation.referencesBlundell, R. & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
dc.relation.referencesBykova, A. (2017). The impact of industry's concentration on innovation: Evidence from Russia. Journal of Corporate Finance Research, 11(1), 37-49. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3108457
dc.relation.referencesClerides, S. K., Lach, S. & Tybout, J. R. (1998). Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 903-947. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555784
dc.relation.referencesCrépon, B., Duguet E. & Mairesse, J. (1998). Research, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working paper N°6696. https://doi.org/10.3386/w6696
dc.relation.referencesCrespi, G. & Zúñiga, P. (2012). Innovation and productivity: Evidence from six Latin American countries. World Development, 40(2), 273-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.010
dc.relation.referencesDe Loecker, J. (2007). Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia. Journal of International Economics, 73(1), 69-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2007.03.003
dc.relation.referencesDe Loecker, J. (2013). Detecting learning by exporting. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 5(3), 1-21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43189629
dc.relation.referencesDemmel, M. C., Máñez, J. A., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E. & Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2017). Product and process innovation and total factor productivity: Evidence for manufacturing in four Latin American countries. Review of Development Economics, 21(4), 1341-1363. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12323
dc.relation.referencesEurostat. (2005). Oslo Manual 2005.
dc.relation.referencesGómez, A. M. (2003). El cambio técnico endógeno y exógeno: debate y modelos propuestos desde la perspectiva schumpeteriana. Porik An, 5(7), 197-224.
dc.relation.referencesGómez-Sánchez, A. M., Máñez Castillejo, J. A. & Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2023a). On the direct and indirect effects of ict on SMEs export performance: Evidence from Colombian manufacturing. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, 6178-6200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01378-7
dc.relation.referencesGómez-Sánchez, A. M., Rosero-Ceballos, E. L. & Mosquera, D. A. (2023b). Imports-ICT linkage in Colombian manufacturing. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 30(2), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2023.2168996
dc.relation.referencesGómez-Sánchez, A. M. (2020). Topics on firms´ strategic decisions in a developing country: the case of manufacturing in Colombia. [Tesis doctoral]. Universidad de Valencia. https://roderic.uv.es/handle/10550/76541
dc.relation.referencesGordon, R. J. (2012). Is US economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working paper 18315. 10.3386/w18315
dc.relation.referencesGriliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 92-116. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3003321
dc.relation.referencesGutiérrez Narváez, L. N. (2020). Análisis de la productividad del sector manufacturero colombiano entre los años 2000-2017.
dc.relation.referencesHahn, C. H. & Park, C. G. (2012). Direction of causality in innovation-exporting linkage: Evidence on Korean manufacturing. ERIA Discussion Paper Series. https://www.eria.org/ERIA-DP-2012-07.pdf
dc.relation.referencesHernández, I. (2005). Forma legal, innovación y productividad de las firmas en la industria manufacturera colombiana. Cuadernos de Economía, 24(42), 135-160. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ceconomia/article/view/9085
dc.relation.referencesHull, K. (2009). Understanding the relationship between economic growth, employment and poverty reduction. Promoting Pro-Poor Growth: Employment. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=5e59488ca888d3b47031f21302a5e2ba5de2fa1f
dc.relation.referencesJulien, P. A. & Ramangalahy, C. (2003). Competitive strategy and performance of exporting SMEs: An empirical investigation of the impact of their export information search and competencies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(3), 227-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00002
dc.relation.referencesLangebaek, A. y Vásquez, D. (2007). Determinantes de la actividad innovadora en la industria manufacturera colombiana. Coyuntura Económica, 37(1), 67-89. http://hdl.handle.net/11445/2091
dc.relation.referencesLevinsohn, J. & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317-341. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3648636
dc.relation.referencesLópez Pineda, L. F. (2010). Transformación productiva de la industria en Colombia y sus regiones después de la apertura económica. Cuadernos de Economía, 29(53), 239-286. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ceconomia/article/view/18619
dc.relation.referencesLove, J. H. & Máñez, J. A. (2019). Persistence in exporting: Cumulative and punctuated learning effects. International Business Review, 28(1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.08.003
dc.relation.referencesLove, J. H. & Roper, S. (2015). SME innovation, exporting and growth: A review of existing evidence. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 28-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614550190 Máñez, J. A., Rochina‐Barrachina, M. E. & Sanchis, J. A. (2020). Foreign sourcing and exporting. The World Economy, 43(5), 1151-1187. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12929
dc.relation.referencesMáñez, J. A., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E., Sanchis, A. & Sanchis, J. A. (2013). Do process innovations boost SMEs productivity growth? Empirical Economics, (44), 1373-1405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0571-7
dc.relation.referencesMáñez, J. A., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E., Sanchis, A. & Sanchis, J. A. (2011). On the role of process innovations on smes productivity growth? Working Papers 1125. https://ideas.repec.org/p/eec/wpaper/1125.html
dc.relation.referencesManjón, M., Máñez, J., Rochina-Barrachina, M. & Sanchis-Llopis, J. (2013). Reconsidering learning by exporting. Review of World Economics, 149, 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-012-0140-3
dc.relation.referencesMarcel, L. y Liseras, N. (2020). Mejorar el desempeño innovando y exportando: evidencia en empresas industriales argentinas. TEC Empresarial, 14(3). 50-71. http://nulan.mdp.edu.ar/id/eprint/3382/1/marcel-liseras-2020.pdf Martínez‐Ros, E. & Labeaga, J. M. (2009). Product and process innovation: Persistence and complementarities. European Management Review, 6(1), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2009.4
dc.relation.referencesMelitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1555536
dc.relation.referencesNelson, R. & Winter, S. (1977). In search of useful theory of innovation. Research Policy. 6(1), 36-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(77)90029-4
dc.relation.referencesNolazco, J. (2020). Efectos entre las actividades de innovación, exportación y productividad: un análisis de las empresas manufactureras peruanas. Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, 1(85), 67-110. https://doi.org/10.13043/DYS.85.2
dc.relation.referencesOlley, G. & Pakes, A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64(6), 1263-1297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171831 Ordoñez-Gutiérrez, Á. V., Méndez-Morales, A. y Herrera, M. M. (2023). Barreras a la innovación: una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Trilogía Ciencia Tecnología Sociedad, 15(29), e2614. https://doi.org/10.22430/21457778.2614
dc.relation.referencesPagés, C. (2010). The importance of ideas: innovation and productivity in Latin America. In the age of productivity: transforming economies from the bottom up. Palgrave Macmillan US.
dc.relation.referencesRamírez, S., Gallego, J. & Tamayo, M. (2020). Human capital, innovation and productivity in Colombian enterprises: A structural approach using instrumental variables. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 29(6), 625-642. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2019.1664700
dc.relation.referencesReina, R. (2016). Productividad de recursos humanos, innovación de producto y desempeño exportador: una investigación empírica. Intangible Capital, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.746
dc.relation.referencesRoberts, M. J. y Tybout, J. (1997). La decisión de exportar en Colombia: un modelo empírico de entrada con costos hundidos. Revista Ensayos Sobre Política Económica, 31(3), 61-100. https://doi.org/10.32468/Espe.3103
dc.relation.referencesRochina-Barrachina, M. E., Máñez, J. A. & Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2010). Process innovations and firm productivity growth. Small Business Economics, 34(2), 147-166. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40540463
dc.relation.referencesRosales Rueda, M. F. (2005). La productividad y sus determinantes: el caso de la industria manufacturera bogotana. [Tesis de maestría]. Universidad de los Andes. http://hdl.handle.net/1992/8928
dc.relation.referencesSanchis-Llopis, J. A., Máñez-Castillejo, J. A. & Gómez-Sánchez, A. M. (2024). The dynamic linkages between exporting and importing in Colombian manufacturing. Applied Economic Analysis, 32(94), 62-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEA-01-2023-0009
dc.relation.referencesSchumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalismo, socialismo y democracia I. Ediciones Folio.
dc.relation.referencesVerspagen, B. (2006). Innovation and economic growth. In J. Fagerberg & D. C. Mowery (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 487-513). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0018
dc.relation.referencesVillareal, N., Lucio, D., Albis, N. y Mora, H. (2015). Determinantes de la innovación y la productividad en la industria manufacturera colombiana por tamaño de firma. Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
dc.relation.referencesWooldridge, J. M. (2009). On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Economics Letters, 104(3), 112-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONLET.2009.04.026
dc.relation.referencesWu, L., Hitt, L. & Lou, B. (2020). Data analytics, innovation, and firm productivity. Management Science, 66(5), 1783-2290. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3281
dc.relation.referencesYang, C. H. (2018). Exports and innovation: The role of heterogeneity in exports. Empirical Economics, 55, 1065-1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1312-8
dc.rightsValentina Ruiz Ruiz, Silvia Torres Ceballos, Andrés Mauricio Gómez-Sánchez - 2024
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.sourcehttps://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/view/3848
dc.subjectAdministración industrialspa
dc.subjectInnovaciones tecnológicasspa
dc.subjectIndustrias manufacturerasspa
dc.subjectOrganización industrialspa
dc.subjectProductividad Industrialspa
dc.subjectInvestigación industrialspa
dc.titleIncidencia de la productividad en la introducción de innovaciones para las empresas manufactureras del Cauca, Colombiaspa
dc.title.translatedImpact of productivity on the introduction of innovations for manufacturing companies in Cauca, Colombiaeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos

Colecciones