Publicación:
Localización de locales comerciales: un enfoque de selección multicriterio

dc.contributor.authorMendoza-Mendoza, Adel
dc.contributor.authorDelahoz-Dominguez, Enrique
dc.contributor.authorMendoza-Casseres, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-15T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-18T14:42:39Z
dc.date.available2019-12-15T00:00:00Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-15
dc.description.abstractRev.esc.adm.neg La decisión referente a la localización de un local comercial es de carácter estratégico, ya que se deben estudiar las diferentes alternativas de acuerdo con múltiples factores, de manera que puede considerarse un proceso complejo de toma de decisiones multicriterio o MCDM. En el presente trabajo se propone una metodología para la selección de localización de locales comerciales que integra el proceso de jerarquía analítica difuso o AHP difuso, el cual se utiliza a fin de ponderar los criterios para la selección bajo la técnica de orden de preferencia por similitud con la solución ideal o TOPSIS, a fin de seleccionar la mejor opción de localización según las calificaciones obtenidas por todas las alternativas. Se presenta un estudio de caso, con el propósito de ilustrar la aplicabilidad de la metodología propuesta, en el que se tienen cinco centros comerciales como elecciones de localización, en conformidad con cuatro criterios: infraestructura, costo de arrendamiento, accesibilidad de clientes y potencial comercial. Las ponderaciones que alcanzaron cada criterio fueron 11,2 %, 21,0 %, 14,3 % y 53,5 %, respectivamente. Finalmente, no solo se demuestra la aplicabilidad de la metodología para el caso sino los alcances que la misma puede llegar a tener en otros sectores de negocio, pues se presenta como una manera confiable y efectiva para seleccionar la mejor opción entre un grupo de alternativas dependiendo de los diferentes criterios clave.spa
dc.description.abstractRev.esc.adm.neg The decision regarding the location of commercial premises is one of strategic nature, as the different alternatives that may be available must be studied according to multiple factors, that way, it can be considered a complex Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) process. This document is intended to propose a methodology for the selection of location of commercial premises that integrates the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process or fuzzy AHP, which is used to weight the selection criteria under the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), in order to select the best option for the location according to the qualifications that are obtained from all the alternatives. A case study is presented, with the purpose of illustrating the applicability of the methodology that has been proposed, in which five shopping centers are used as location choices, according to four criteria: infrastructure, cost of renting, accessibility to customers, and commercial potential. The weights that were achieved by each criterion were 11.2 %, 21.0 %, 14.3 %, and 53.5 %, respectively. Finally, it not only demonstrates the applicability of the methodology for the case, but also, the scope that it can have in other business sectors, since it is presented as a reliable and effective way to select the best option among a group of alternatives, depending on the different key criteriaeng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/html
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/xml
dc.identifier.doi10.21158/01208160.n87.2019.2446
dc.identifier.eissn2590-521X
dc.identifier.issn0120-8160
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10882/18544
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n87.2019.2446
dc.publisherUniversidad Ean
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/download/2446/1988
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/download/2446/2029
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/download/2446/2045
dc.relation.citationeditionGestión del talento humano en las organizaciones
dc.relation.citationissue87
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Ean
dc.relation.referencesAlizadeh, S.; Rad, M. M. S.; Bazzazi, A. A. (2016). Alunite processing method selection using the AHP and Topsis approaches under fuzzy environment. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 26(6), 1017-1023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2016.09.009
dc.relation.referencesAsakereh, A.; Soleymani, M.; Sheikhdavoodi, M. J. (2017). A GIS-based Fuzzy-AHP method for the evaluation of solar farms locations: case study in Khuzestan province, Iran. Solar Energy, 155, 342-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.05.075
dc.relation.referencesBehzadian, M.; Otaghsara, S. K.; Yazdani, M.; Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of Topsis applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 13051-13069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
dc.relation.referencesBeikkhakhian, Y.; Javanmardi, M.; Karbasian, M.; Khayambashi, B. (2015). The application of ISM model in evaluating agile supplier’s selection criteria and ranking suppliers using fuzzy Topsis-AHP methods. Expert systems with Applications, 42(15-16), 6224-6236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.035
dc.relation.referencesBhushan, N.; Rai, K. (2007). Strategic decision making: applying the analytic hierarchy process. Springer Science & Business Media.
dc.relation.referencesBüyüközkan, G.; Kahraman, C.; Ruan, D. (2004). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach for software development strategy selection. International Journal of General Systems, 33(2-3), 259-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03081070310001633581
dc.relation.referencesCarlsson, C.; Fullér, R. (1996). Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making: recent developments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 78(2), 139-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(95)00165-4
dc.relation.referencesChauhan, A.; Singh, A. (2016). A hybrid multi-criteria decision making method approach for selecting a sustainable location of healthcare waste disposal facility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1001-1010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.098
dc.relation.referencesChen, L. F.; Tsai, C. T. (2016). Data mining framework based on rough set theory to improve location selection decisions: a case study of a restaurant chain. Tourism Management, 53, 197-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.10.001
dc.relation.referencesDožić, S.; Lutovac, T.; Kalić, M. (2018). Fuzzy AHP approach to passenger aircraft type selection. Journal of Air Transport Management, 68, 165-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.08.003
dc.relation.referencesGuerrero, L. C. U.; Marín, L. S. M.; Gómez, J. C. O. (2016). Selección multicriterio de aliado estratégico para la operación de carga terrestre. Estudios Gerenciales, 32(138), 35-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2015.09.002
dc.relation.referencesGürcan, Ö. F.; Beyca, Ö. F.; Arslan, Ç. Y.; Eldemir, F. (2016). Third party logistics (3PL) provider selection with AHP application. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 226-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.018
dc.relation.referencesHanine, M.; Boutkhoum, O.; Tikniouine, A.; Agouti, T. (2016). Application of an integrated multicriteria decision making AHP-Topsis methodology for ETL software selection. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1888-z
dc.relation.referencesHualpa-Zúñiga, A. M.; Suárez-Roldán, C. (2013). Ubicación y dimensionamiento como parámetros en el diseño de almacenes: revisión del estado de arte. Ingeniería, 18(1), 65-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.reving.2013.1.a04
dc.relation.referencesHwang, C. L.; Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. En Multiple attribute decision making. (58-191). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/9783-642-48318-9
dc.relation.referencesHong, L.; Xiaohua, Z. (2011). Study on location selection of multi-objective emergency logistics center based on AHP. Procedia Engineering, 15, 2128-2132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.398
dc.relation.referencesHsieh, M. C.; Wang, E. M. Y.; Lee, W. C.; Li, L. W.; Hsieh, C. Y.; Tsai, W.; Wang, C. P.; Huang, J.L.; Liu, T. C. (2018). Application of HFACS, fuzzy TOPSIS, and AHP for identifying important human error factors in emergency departments in Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 67, 171-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2018.05.004
dc.relation.referencesJayawickrama, H. M. M. M.; Kulatunga, A. K.; Mathavan, S. (2017). Fuzzy AHP based plant sustainability evaluation method. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 571-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.073
dc.relation.referencesJumaah, F. M.; Zaidan, A. A.; Zaidan, B. B.; Bahbibi, R.; Qahtan, M. Y.; Sali, A. (2018). Technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution for solving complex situations in multicriteria optimization of the tracking channels of GPS baseband telecommunication receivers. Telecommunication Systems, 68(3), 425-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-0170401-5
dc.relation.referencesKazazi, S.; Akbari, A.; Jabbari, M.; Asefi, H. (2018). Parking lot site selection using a fuzzy AHP-Topsis framework in Tuyserkan, Iran. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 144(3), 04018022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000456
dc.relation.referencesMosadeghi, R.; Warnken, J.; Tomlinson, R.; Mirfenderesk, H. (2015). Comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 54-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.10.001
dc.relation.referencesPrakash, C.; Barua, M. K. (2015). Integration of AHP-Topsis method for prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics adoption to overcome its barriers under fuzzy environment. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, 599-615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.03.001
dc.relation.referencesRoig-Tierno, N.; Baviera-Puig, A.; Buitrago-Vera, J.; Mas-Verdu, F. (2013). The retail site location decision process using GIS and the analytical hierarchy process. Applied Geography, 40, 191198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.03.005
dc.relation.referencesSaaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA214804
dc.relation.referencesSaaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
dc.relation.referencesSantis, R.; Golliat, L.; Aguiar, E. (2017). Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: case study from a Brazilian railway operator. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(3), 428-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2017.v14.n3.a15
dc.relation.referencesSennaroglu, B.; Celebi, G. V. (2018). A military airport location selection by AHP integrated Promethee and Vikor methods. Transportation Research Part D: transport and Environment, 59, 160-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.022
dc.relation.referencesSenouci, M. A.; Mushtaq, M. S.; Hoceini, S.; Mellouk, A. (2016). Topsis-based dynamic approach for mobile network interface selection. Computer Networks, 107, 304-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2016.04.012
dc.relation.referencesSevtsuk, A. (2014). Location and agglomeration: the distribution of retail and food businesses in dense urban environments. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(4), 374-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X14550401
dc.relation.referencesWalczak, D.; Rutkowska, A. (2017). Project rankings for participatory budget based on the fuzzy Topsis method. European Journal of Operational Research, 260(2), 706-714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.12.044
dc.relation.referencesYıldız, N.; Tüysüz, F. (2018). A hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach for strategic retail location investment: application to Turkish food retailing. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2018.02.006
dc.relation.referencesZhao, L.; Li, H.; Li, M.; Sun, Y.; Hu, Q.; Mao, S.; Li, J.; Xue, J. (2018). Location selection of intra-city distribution hubs in the metro-integrated logistics system. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 80, 246-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.06.024
dc.rightsRevista Escuela de Administración de Negocios - 2019
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri
dc.sourcehttps://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/view/2446
dc.subjectCentros comercialesspa
dc.subjectUbicación de almacenesspa
dc.subjectAlmacenes al por menorspa
dc.subjectPlaneación estratégicaspa
dc.subjectAnálisis de mercadeospa
dc.titleLocalización de locales comerciales: un enfoque de selección multicriteriospa
dc.title.translatedThe location of commercial premises: a multi-criteria selection approacheng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos

Colecciones