Publicación:
Estilos de toma de decisiones intuitivo y racional e improvisación organizacional: ¿Influye la consciencia de los empleados acerca de la inteligencia artificial?

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorVélez-Jaramillo, Juan Daniel
dc.contributor.authorArias-Pérez, José Enrique
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Zapata, Esteban
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-15T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-18T14:44:17Z
dc.date.available2024-07-15T00:00:00Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-15
dc.description.abstractLos empleados están cada vez más conscientes del riesgo de ser reemplazados por la inteligencia artificial. Paradójicamente, ellos siguen siendo actores relevantes en la empresa cuando se trata de tomar decisiones para improvisar o dar respuesta en tiempo real a los cambios del entorno. El objetivo del artículo es evaluar el efecto moderador negativo de la consciencia de los empleados acerca de la inteligencia artificial (CEIA), en la relación entre los dos estilos de toma de decisiones: intuitivo (TDI) y racional (TDR), y la improvisación organizacional (IO). El modelo de investigación se testeó con datos recolectados mediante una encuesta realizada en empresas manufactureras y de servicios. Sorpresivamente, se encontró una moderación positiva de la CEIA en la relación entre TDI y IO. Este resultado permite controvertir algunos estudios previos que han advertido en reiteradas ocasiones sobre el peligro de la CEIA. Sin embargo, el resultado sugiere que este efecto es positivo solo cuando la empresa está bajo la presión de idear una respuesta en tiempo real a las exigencias del entorno.spa
dc.description.abstractEmployees are getting more aware of the risk of being replaced by artificial intelligence. Paradoxically, they still are relevant players in the company when it comes to making decisions to improvise or answer on the spot to environmental changes. The aim of the article is to analyze the negative moderating effect of employee`s artificial intelligence awareness (EAIA) in the relationship between both, intuitive and rational decision-making style, and organizational improvisation. Surprisingly, a positive moderation effect of EAIA on intuitive decision-making style and organizational improvisation was found. This result allows us to dispute some previous studies that have repeatedly warned about the danger of CEIA. However, the result suggests that this effect is positive only when the company is under pressure to devise a real-time response to environmental demands.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.21158/01208160.n96.2024.3767
dc.identifier.eissn2590-521X
dc.identifier.issn0120-8160
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10882/18659
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n96.2024.3767
dc.publisherUniversidad Ean
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/download/3767/2432
dc.relation.citationissue96
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Ean
dc.relation.referencesAbubakar, A. M., Elrehail, H., Alatailat, M. A. & Elçi, A. (2019). Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 4(2), 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003
dc.relation.referencesAhumada-Valenzuela, O., Villalobos, J. R., Leyva-López, J. y Solano-Noriega, J. (2020). Un sistema de apoyo a la toma de decisiones para planificar la introducción de nuevos productos en las cadenas de suministro de alimentos perecederos. Cuadernos de Administración, 33. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cao33.adssp
dc.relation.referencesArco-García, L., Casas-Cardoso, G. y Nowé, A. (2020). Metodología de agrupación en dos niveles para una medición de datos inteligente. Cuadernos de Administración, 33. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cao33.tlcms
dc.relation.referencesArias-Pérez, J., Alegre, J. & Villar, C. (2023). Uncovering the role of competitor orientation and emotional capability in enhancing innovation performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(5), 1304-1315. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-10-2020-2463
dc.relation.referencesArias-Pérez, J. & Cepeda-Cardona, J. (2022). Knowledge management strategies and organizational improvisation: What changed after the emergence of technological turbulence caused by artificial intelligence? Baltic Journal of Management, 17(2), 250-265. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-01-2021-0027
dc.relation.referencesArias-Pérez, J. & Vélez-Jaramillo, J. (2022). Understanding knowledge hiding under technological turbulence caused by artificial intelligence and robotics. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(6), 1476-1491. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2021-0058
dc.relation.referencesArshad, D. & Hughes, P. (2009). Examining organizational improvisation: the role of strategic reasoning and managerial factors. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1085950
dc.relation.referencesArshad, D., Julienti, L., Bakar, A., Ahmad, H. & Hassan, S. (2015, June 8-9). Unraveling the link between environmental factors and organizational improvisation [Conference]. Proceeding of the International Conference on Social Science Research. Meliá Hotel Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
dc.relation.referencesArshad, D. & Lamsali, H. (2012, July 4-6). The role of information and memory in shaping organisational improvisation [Conference]. Knowledge Management International Conference 2012 (KMICe2012). Johor Bahru, Malaysia. http://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/11021/1/CR149.pdf
dc.relation.referencesBrougham, D. & Haar, J. (2018). Smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms (STARA): Employees’ perceptions of our future workplace. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(2), 239-257. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.55
dc.relation.referencesButner, K. & Ho, G. (2019). How the human-machine interchange will transform business operations. Strategy & Leadership, 47(2), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/SL-01-2019-0003
dc.relation.referencesConnor, P. & Becker, B. (2003). Personel value systems and decision-making styles of public managers. Public Personel Management, 32(1), 155-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600303200109
dc.relation.referencesCurşeu, P. L. & Schruijer, S. G. L. (2012). Decision styles and rationality: An analysis of the predictive validity of the general decision-making style inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(6), 1053-1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412448066
dc.relation.referencesDayan, M. & Elbanna, S. (2011). Antecedents of team intuition and its impact on the success of new product development projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(s1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00868.x
dc.relation.referencesDeligianni, I., Dimitratos, P., Petrou, A. & Aharoni, Y. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation and international performance: The moderating effect of decision-making rationality. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(2), 462-480. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12152
dc.relation.referencesDu, J. & Levy, I. (2019). Examining the effect of stress on decision making under risk and ambiguity. https://economics.yale.edu/sites/default/files/2023-01/Jacquelyn_Du_SeniorEssay%202019.pdf
dc.relation.referencesDu, W., Wu, J., Liu, S. & Hackney, R. A. (2019). Effective organizational improvisation in information systems development: Insights from the Tencent messaging system development. Information and Management, 56(4), 614-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.10.003
dc.relation.referencesDutta, S. & Lanvin, B. (2019). The network readiness index 2019: Towards a future-ready society. Portulans Institute. https://networkreadinessindex.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/NRI_2019_Report.pdf
dc.relation.referencesEurostat. (2009). ‘High-technology’ and ‘knowledge based services’ aggregations based on NACE Rev. 2. Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/Annexes/htec_esms_an_3.pdf
dc.relation.referencesFornell, C. & Larcker, D. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
dc.relation.referencesFrykmer, T., Uhr, C. & Tehler, H. (2018). On collective improvisation in crisis management - A scoping study analysis. Safety Science, 110, 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.028
dc.relation.referencesGao, P., Song, Y. & Mi, J. (2015). Organizational improvisation and product innovation performance: A meta-analysis. Metallurgical and Mining Industry, 7(6), 221-232.
dc.relation.referencesGoll, I. & Rasheed, A. A. (2005). The relationships between top management demographic characteristics, rational decision making, environmental munificence, and firm performance. Organization Studies, 26(7), 999-1023. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605053538
dc.relation.referencesGroza, M.D. & Ragland, C.B. (2016). Marketing challenges in a turbulent business environment: Proceedings of the 2014 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) World Marketing Congress. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19428-8
dc.relation.referencesGustafsson, C. & Lindahl, M. (2017). Improvisation - An emergence theory perspective. Culture and Organization, 23(3), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2015.1021801
dc.relation.referencesHair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesHair, J., Risher, J., Sarstedt, M. & Ringle, C. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
dc.relation.referencesHarren, V. A. (1979). A model of career decision making for college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90065-4
dc.relation.referencesHenao-Ramírez, A. M. & López-Zapata, E. (2022). Analysis of the factors influencing adoption of 3D design digital technologies in Colombian firms. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(2), 429-454. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-10-2020-0416
dc.relation.referencesHernández-Sampieri, R. y Mendoza, C. (2020). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill.
dc.relation.referencesHughes, P., Hodgkinson, I. R., Arshad, D., Hughes, M. & Leone, V. (2018). Planning to improvise? The role of reasoning in the strategy process: Evidence from Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35, 449-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9524-1
dc.relation.referencesImamoglu, S. Z., Ince, H., Turkcan, H. & Atakay, B. (2019). The effect of organizational justice and organizational commitment on knowledge sharing and firm performance. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 899-906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.129
dc.relation.referencesKhatri, N. & Alvin, H. N. (2000). The role of intuition in strategic decision making. Human Relations, 53(1), 57-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700531004
dc.relation.referencesKock, N. & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: the inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
dc.relation.referencesKung, L. & Kung, H. J. (2019). Organization improvisational capability: Scale development and validation. SIGMIS Database, 50(2), 94-110. https://doi.org/10.1145/3330472.3330479
dc.relation.referencesLeybourne, S. & Sadler-Smith, E. (2006). The role of intuition and improvisation in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24(6), 483-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.03.007
dc.relation.referencesLiu, Y., Lv, D., Ying, Y., Arndt, F. & Wei, J. (2018). Improvisation for innovation: The contingent role of resource and structural factors in explaining innovation capability. Technovation, 74-75, 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.010
dc.relation.referencesLong, J. H. & Yu, J. Y. (2009). Organizational improvisation: prerequisites and determinants [Conference]. 6th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery. Tianjin, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/FSKD.2009.232
dc.relation.referencesMalik, A., Budhwar, P. & Kazmi, B. A. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted HRM: Towards an extended strategic framework. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100940
dc.relation.referencesMariano, S. & Laker, B. (2024). On-the-fly decision making within organizations: A systematic literature review and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 174, 114484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114484
dc.relation.referencesMichailidis, E. & Banks, A. P. (2016). The relationship between burnout and risk-taking in workplace decision-making and decision-making style. Work and Stress, 30(3), 278-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2016.1213773
dc.relation.referencesMiner, A. S., Bassoff, P. & Moorman, C. (2001). Organizational and improvisation learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 304-337. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667089
dc.relation.referencesMoorman, C. & Miner, A. S. (1998). organizational improvisation and organizational memory. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 698-723. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.1255634
dc.relation.referencesMuhuri, P. K., Shukla, A. K. & Abraham, A. (2019). Industry 4.0: A bibliometric analysis and detailed overview. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 78, 218-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2018.11.007
dc.relation.referencesOztemel, E. & Gursev, S. (2020). Literature review of industry 4.0 and related technologies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31, 127-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8
dc.relation.referencesPanichayakorn, T. & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Mobilizing organizational performance through robotic and artificial intelligence awareness in mediating role of supply chain agility. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(5), 757-768. https://doi.org/10.59160/ijscm.v8i5.3669
dc.relation.referencesPavlou, P. A. & El Sawy, O. A. (2010). The “third hand”: It-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Information Systems Research, 21(3), 443-471. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0280
dc.relation.referencesPorcelli, A. J. & Delgado, M. R. (2017). Stress and decision making: Effects on valuation, learning, and risk-taking. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 14, 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.11.015
dc.relation.referencesScott, S. G. & Bruce, R. A. (1995). Decision-making style: the development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(5), 818-831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055005017
dc.relation.referencesSerenko, A. & Choo, C. W. (2020). Knowledge sabotage as an extreme form of counterproductive knowledge behavior: The role of narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and competitiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(9), 2299-2325. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2020-0416
dc.relation.referencesShick, M., Johnson, N. & Fan, Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence and the end of bounded rationality: a new era in organizational decision making. Development and Learning in Organizations, 38(4), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-02-2023-0048
dc.relation.referencesSpicer, D. P. & Sadler-Smith, E. (2005). An examination of the general decision making style questionnaire in two UK samples. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(2), 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940510579777
dc.relation.referencesStacey, R. (1993). Strategy as order emerging from chaos. Long Range Planning, 26(1), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(93)90228-8
dc.relation.referencesTabesh, P. & Vera, D. M. (2020). Top managers’ improvisational decision-making in crisis: A paradox perspective. Management Decision, 58(10), 2235-2256. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2020-1060
dc.relation.referencesTeng, E., Zhang, L. & Qiu, Y. (2019). Always bad for creativity? An affect-based model of job insecurity and the moderating effects of giving support and receiving support. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 40(3), 803-829. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X17744026
dc.relation.referencesTeng, R., Zhou, S., Zheng, W. & Ma, C. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) awareness and work withdrawal: evaluating chained mediation through negative work-related rumination and emotional exhaustion. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(7), 2311-2326. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2023-0240
dc.relation.referencesVelázquez-Cazares, M. G., Gil-Lafuente, A. M., León-Castro, E. & Blanco-Mesa, F. (2021). Innovation capabilities measurement using fuzzy methodologies: a Colombian SMEs case. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 27, 384-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-020-09321-w
dc.relation.referencesVera, D. & Crossan, M. (2005). Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organization Science, 16(3), 203-224. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0126
dc.relation.referencesWIPO. (2023). Global innovation index 2023: innovation in the face of uncertainty. WIPO.
dc.rightsJuan Daniel Vélez-Jaramillo, José Enrique Arias-Pérez, Esteban López-Zapata - 2024
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.sourcehttps://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/view/3767
dc.subjectAnálisis ocupacionalspa
dc.subjectEvaluación de personalspa
dc.subjectAdiestramiento ocupacionalspa
dc.subjectInteligencia artificialspa
dc.subjectCambio tecnológicospa
dc.subjectTransformación organizacionalspa
dc.titleEstilos de toma de decisiones intuitivo y racional e improvisación organizacional: ¿Influye la consciencia de los empleados acerca de la inteligencia artificial?spa
dc.title.translatedIntuitive and rational decision-making styles and organizational improvisation: Does it influence employees' awareness of artificial intelligence?eng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos

Colecciones

Revista Ean